Azərbaycanca (AZ) Azərbaycanca (AZ)Deutsch (DE) Deutsch (DE)English (US) English (US)Қазақша (KZ) Қазақша (KZ)Lietuva (LT) Lietuva (LT)සිංහල (LK) සිංහල (LK)Türkçe (TR) Türkçe (TR)O'zbekcha (UZ) O'zbekcha (UZ)中國人 (CN) 中國人 (CN)
Support
Free Download and Information Platform
  • Wikipedia

Proto-Sino-Tibetan (PST) is the linguistic reconstruction of the Sino-Tibetan proto-language and the common ancestor of all languages in it, including the Sinit

Proto-Sino-Tibetan

  • HomePage
  • Wikipedia
  • Proto-Sino-Tibetan

Proto-Sino-Tibetan (PST) is the linguistic reconstruction of the Sino-Tibetan proto-language and the common ancestor of all languages in it, including the Sinitic languages, the Tibetic languages, Yi, Bai, Burmese, Karen, Tangut, and Naga. Paul K. Benedict (1972) placed a particular emphasis on Old Chinese, Classical Tibetan, Jingpho, Written Burmese, Garo, and Mizo in his discussion of Proto-Sino-Tibetan.

Proto-Sino-Tibetan
PST, Proto-Trans-Himalayan
Reconstruction ofSino-Tibetan languages
Era7000–5000 BCE
Lower-order reconstructions
  • Proto-Sinitic
  • Proto-Tibeto-Burman

While Proto-Sino-Tibetan is commonly considered to have two direct descendants, Proto-Sinitic and Proto-Tibeto-Burman, in recent years several scholars have argued that this was not well-substantiated, and have taken to calling the group "Trans-Himalayan". In this case, Proto-Tibeto-Burman may be considered as equivalent to Proto-Sino-Tibetan if Sinitic is indeed not the first branch to split from Proto-Sino-Tibetan.

Contents

Features

Proto-Sino-Tibetan is believed to have been an agglutinative language with an elaborate system of morphological markers. Reconstructed features include prefixes such as the causative s-, the intransitive m-, the miscellaneous b-, d-, g-, and r-, suffixes -s, -t, and -n, and a set of conditioning factors that resulted in the development of tone in most languages of the family. The existence of such an elaborate system of inflectional changes in Proto-Sino-Tibetan makes the language distinctive from some of its modern descendants, such as the Sinitic languages, which have mostly or completely become analytic.

Proto-Sino-Tibetan, like Old Chinese, also included numerous consonant clusters, and was not a tonal language.

Phonology

Benedict (1972)

The table below shows consonant phonemes reconstructed by Benedict.[page needed]

⠀
Consonants Labial Dent./Alv. Post-alv./Pal. Velar
Nasal m n ŋ
Plosive p b t d c k g
Fricative s z ʒ h
Approximant w l j (w)
Rhotic r

Peiros & Starostin (1996)

The reconstruction by Peiros & Starostin suggests a much more complex consonant inventory. The phonemes in brackets are reconstructions that are considered dubious.

⠀
Consonants Labial Dent./Alv. Post-alv./Pal. Velar Uvular Laryngeal
Nasal m n ń ŋ
Plosive p b
pʰ (bʰ)
t d
tʰ (dʰ)
k g
kʰ (gʰ)
(q) (ɢ)
(qʰ) (ɢʰ)
ʔ
Affricate c ʒ (ƛ)
cʰ (ʒʰ)
ć ʒ́
ćʰ ʒ́ʰ
Fricative s ś x ɣ (χ)
Approximant w l j (w)
Rhotic r

Hill (2019)

The following tables show the reconstruction of Proto-Sino-Tibetan phonemes by Nathan Hill (2019).

Consonants Labial Coronal Palatal Velar Labiovelar Uvular Labiouvular Glottal
Nasal *m *n *ŋ *ŋʷ
Plosive voiced *b *d *g *ɢ *ɢʷ
voiceless *p *t *k *kʷ *q *ʔ
Affricate voiced *dz
voiceless *ts
Fricatives *(s)
Approximant *l *j
Rhotic *r
  1. The sibilant correspondences are simply presented according to their proto-Burmish outcomes, as no patterns could be found by Hill.
  2. This consonant can only exist as a coda.
  3. This phonetic nature of this rhotic is unknown.

The consonants /p t k q ʔ m n ŋ l r j/ can take coda position, as well as the cluster /rl/. While Hill does not reconstruct /j/ as an initial consonant due to Baxter and Sagart's Old Chinese reconstruction lacking such a phoneme, he mentions that Jacques and Schuessler suggest a /j/ initial for some Old Chinese words due to potential Tibetan or Rgyalrongic cognates.

Vowels Front Central Back
Close i u
Mid e ə o
Open a

Hill also claims that his reconstruction is incomplete, as it does not account for Tibetic palatalization, proto-Burmish preglottalization, Sinitic aspirates, and the Sinitic type A and B distinction of syllables.

Sound correspondences

The sound correspondences cited by Hill (2019) are as follows. Hill bases his correspondences to Old Chinese off of the Baxter-Sagart reconstruction, and thus that reconstruction will be used in the following correspondence tables.

Initials

Note that many cognate sets with /p t k b d g/ initials between Old Chinese, Tibetan and Burmese agree in every phoneme in a given word except for whether an initial consonant is voiced or not. Jacques explains these discrepancies as at least partially triggered by pre-syllables that were lost or decayed on the way to Chinese, Tibetan and Burmese.

Expected initial correspondences in Hill (2019)
Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese Tibetan Written Burmese
*p- *p- p- p-
*t- *t- t- t-
*k- *k- k- k-
*kʷ- *kʷ- k- ?
*b- *b- b- p-
*d- *d- d- t-
*g- *g- g- g-
*q- *q- k(h)- (lost)
*ɢ- *ɢ- g- ?
*ɢʷ- *ɢʷ- g- w-
*ts- *ts- ts(h)- ch-
*dz- *dz- (d)z- c-
Vowels
Vowel correspondences of vowels in Hill (2019)
Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese Tibetan Written Burmese
*a *a a
o
a
*e *e e
i
a
a
*i *i i i
*o *o o wa
*u *u u u
o
*uw *u u ui
uiw
*ə *ə a a
*əw *o u u
*əj *əj a ~ e i
  1. After rounded dorsal consonants.
  2. Before velar consonants.
  3. Before dental or liquid consonants.
  4. Before velar, dental or liquid consonants. In Proto-Burmish, pre-velar *i (from *e and *i) were still both distinct from *a.
  5. o in Old Burmese.
  6. Before velars. Did not merge with inherited *o > Old Burmese o > Written Burmese wa.
  7. In Old Burmese.
Finals
Final correspondences according to Hill (2019)
Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese Tibetan Written Burmese
*-p *-p -b -p
*-t *-t -d -t
*-k *-k -g -k
*-kə *-k (lost) (lost)
*-q *-ʔ -g -k
*-ʔ *-ʔ (lost) (lost)
*-m *-m -m -m
*-n *-n -n -n
-ñ(ñ)
*-ŋ *-ŋ -ng -ng
*-l *-j -l (lost)
*-r *-r -r (lost)
*-rl *-r -l (lost)
  1. Except after *a, where this final instead surfaces as -' (transliterated ḫ by Hill).
  2. After *e or *i.
  3. Unless after *u; in this case the final surfaces as -y.

Sound changes

Final consonant changes

In Gong Huangcheng's reconstruction of the Proto-Sino-Tibetan language, the finals *-p, *-t, *-k, *-m, *-n, and *-ŋ in Proto-Sino-Tibetan remained in Proto-Sinitic and Proto-Tibeto-Burman. However, in Old Chinese, the finals *-k and *-ŋ that came after the close vowel *-i- underwent an irregular change of *-k>*-t and *-ŋ >*-n. In Proto-Tibeto-Burman, *-kw and *-ŋw underwent a sound change to become *-k and *-ŋ respectively, while in Old Chinese those finals remained until Middle Chinese, where the finals underwent the same sound change.

Furthermore, in Proto-Tibeto-Burman, the finals *-g, *-gw, and *-d underwent the following changes:

  1. *-d>*-y
  2. *-gw>*-w
  3. *-g>*-w when it follows the vowel *-u-
  4. *-g>*-∅ when it follows the vowel *a and *-a-.

Example of sound changes

Voiceless plosive finals

Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese (Li Fang-Kuei) Proto-Tibeto-Burman
*-p *-jəp 汲 *kjəp *ka·p
泣 *khrjəp *krap
立 *(g-)rjəp *g-ryap
*-jap 接 *tsjap *tsyap
*-jup 入 *njəp *nup~ *nip
*-t *-iat 八 *priat *b-r-gyat
殺 *r-siat *g-sat
*-uat 脫 *hluat *g-lwat
*-jit 一 *·jit *it
*-k *-ək 翼 *lək *lak
*-jək 織 *tjək *tak
息 *sjək *sak
食 *N-ljək *(m-)lyak
飼 *s-ljəks *(s-)lyak
*-ik 節 *tsik>*tsit *tsik
縊 *·iks, *·jiks *ik
*-jik 蝨 *srjik>*srjit *s-rik
*-juk 曲 *khjuk *guk~kuk
*-kw *-əkw 毒 *dəkw *duk~*tuk
*-jəkw 腹 *phjəkw, *bjəkw *pu·k~*buk
六 *drjəkw *d-ruk

Nasal finals

Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese (Li Fang-Kuei) Proto-Tibeto-Burman
*-m *-əm 含 *gəm *gam
頷 *gəm *gam
*-jəm 飲 *·jəmx *am
尋 *ljəm *la[·]m
*-jim 坅 *khjamx “pit” *kim
*-um 三 *səm *g-sum
*-jum 尋 *ljəm *lum
*-n *-an 乾 *kan *kan
*-jin 辛 *sjin *m-sin
*-ng *-jəng 夢 *mjəngs *mang
蒸 *tjəng *tang
*-jang 紡 *phjangx *pang
涼 *grjang *grang
迎 *ngrjang *ngang
*-ing 盈 *bling *bling~pling
*-jing 年 *ning>*nin *ning
名 *mjing *r-ming
甥 *srjing *sring
薪 *sjing>*sjin *sing
仁 *njing>*njin *s-ning
*-ngw *-jəngw 躬 *kjəngw *gung

Voiced plosive finals

Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese (Li Fang-Kuei) Proto-Tibeto-Burman
*-b *-əb 柔 *njəb>*njəgw *nəw
*-d *-əd 𤈦 *smjədx *məy
*-ad 簸 *padx/s *pwa·y
太  *tads *tay
蜾 *kwadx *kwa·y
我 *ngadx *ngay
移 *lad *lay
*-id 四 *sjids *b-liy
*-jid 妣 *pjidx *piy
畀 *sbjids *biy
几 *krjidx *kriy
屎 *skhljidx *kliy
死 *sjidx *siy
*-g *-əg        母 *məgx *ma
*-jəg      負 *bjəgx *ba, *bak
子 *tsjəgx *tsa
慈 *dzjəg *m-dza
孳 *dzjəgs *za
耳 *njəgx *r-na~*g-na
牛 *ngwjəg *ngwa
*-ag 補 *pagx *pa
苦 *khagx *ka
吾 *ngag *nga
五 *ngagx *l-nga~*b-nga
狐 *gwag *gwa
*-jag 斧 *pjagx *r-pwa
夫 *pjag *(p)wa
父 *bjagx *pa
無 *mjag *ma
魚 *ngjag *ngya
咀 *dzjag *dza
汝 *njagx *na
*-ug 口 *khugx *kuw
寇 *khugs *r-kuw
*-jug 霧 *m(r)jugs *(r-)muw
軀 *khjug *(s-)kuw
乳 *njugx *nuw
*-gw *-əgw 寶 *pəgwx *puw
抱 *bəgwx *buw
*-jəgw 鳩 *kjəgw *kuw
九 *kjəgwx *d-kuw
舅 *gjəgwx *kuw
*-agw 豪 *gagw *m/s-gaw
號 *gagws *gaw
熬 *ngagw *r-ngaw
臊 *sagw *sa·w
*-jagw 飄/漂 *phjagw *pyaw

Liquid finals

Proto-Sino-Tibetan Old Chinese (Li Fang-Kuei) Proto-Tibeto-Burman
*-l *-al 肝 *kan *m-kal
*-ul 本 *pən *bul~*pul
*-jul 銀 *ngjən *(d)-ngul
閩 *mjən *s-brul
*-jal 疲 *brjal *bal
*-il 洒 *silx *(m-)s(y)il
*-r *-ar 播 *s-bars *bwar
皤 *bar, *par *pwa:r
*-jar 販 *pjans *par
鮮 *sjan *sar
*-uar 酸 *suan *swa·r
*-jur 飛 *pjər *pur~*pir

Vocabulary

Words which do not have reliable Sinitic parallels are accompanied by a (TB).

Social terms

English Reconstruction by Old Chinese (Baxter-Sagart)
I. Peiros & S. Starostin J. Matisoff
Person (in general) *mĭ *mi 民 *mi[ŋ]
Male *pă *pʷa 父 *p(r)aʔ
Female *mǝw *mow 母 *mˤoʔ (or məʔ)
Name (of a person) *miǝŋ *miŋ 名 *C.meŋ

Natural phenomena

English Reconstruction by Old Chinese (Baxter-Sagart)
I. Peiros & S. Starostin J. Matisoff
Earth *ƛăy *ley ~ *lǝy 地 *[l]ˤej-s
Stone *ƛɨāŋ ~ *ƛɨāk *luŋ ~ *luk 琭 *[r]ˤok
Sand *srāy *sa 沙 *sˤraj
Fire *mēyH *mey 火 *[qʷʰ]ˤəjʔ
Smoke *gʰiw *kǝw 熏 *qʰu[n]
Water *tujʔ *t(w)i(y) 水 *s.turʔ
Rain *(r-)qʰʷăH *rwa ~ *wa 雨 *C.ɢʷ(r)aʔ
Sun *nĭy *nǝy 日 *C.nik
Moon (TB) *(s-)lăH *la N/A
Star *(s-)q(ʰ)ār *kar 扈 *m-qˤaʔ
Night *yăH *ya 夜 *[ɢ]Ak-s
Tree *sĭŋ *siŋ ~ *sik 薪 *[s]i[n]
Leaf *lăp *lap 葉 *l[a]p
Plant root *bʰūl *bul ~ *pul 本 *C.pˤə[n]ʔ
  1. See also the dialectal 𤈦 /*m̥əjʔ/ and 燬 /*m̥ajʔ/.
  2. Chinese 月 /*[ŋ]ʷat/ is a descendant of another PST word, *s-ŋʷ(j)a-t.
  3. Unclear. The more common word is 星 /*s-tsʰˤeŋ/, which is possibly related to 清 /*tsʰeŋ/, in turn from PST *(t)s(j)aŋ.

Qualitative features of an object

English Reconstruction by Old Chinese (Baxter-Sagart)
I. Peiros & S. Starostin J. Matisoff
Black, dark (TB) *nǝk *nak 黑 *m̥ˤək
White wār *hwār 皤 *[b]ˤar
Big *tayH *tay 大 *lˤa[t]-s
Cold *(k-)răŋ ~ *(k-)răk *glak ~ *glaŋ ~ *graŋ 涼 *C.raŋ
Warm *lɨm *lim ~ *lum 融 *luŋ
Long (TB) *rĭŋ *riŋ N/A
New *cʰăr *sar 鮮 *s[a]r
  1. It is possible that *s-nak is a descendant of *s-maŋ ~ s-mak (whence OC /*m̥ˤək/).
  2. The more commonly used 白 /*bˤrak/ might be a derivation of it.

Verb stems

English Reconstruction by Old Chinese (Baxter-Sagart)
I. Peiros & S. Starostin J. Matisoff
To eat *ʒʰa *dzya 咀 *dzaɁ
To drink *dʰɨn ~ *dʰɨŋ *daŋ ~ *doŋ
To bite/chew *wā *wa
To die *sĭy(H) *sǝy 死 *sijʔ
To know, to think *siǝH *syey 悉 *[s]i[t]
To hear (TB) *tʰa(s) *ta N/A
To sleep *mĭyH *mwǝy 寐 *mi[t]-s
To stand *ryǝp *r(y)ap 立 *k.rәp
To sit *tūŋ ~ *tūk *duŋ ~ *duk ~ *tuŋ ~ *tuk 住 *dro(ʔ)-s
Give *pĭy *bǝy 畀 *pi[k]‑s

Numbers

Number Reconstruction by Old Chinese (Baxter-Sagart) Old Tibetan Old Burmese
I. Peiros & S. Starostin J. Matisoff
1 *dyiǝk *dik ~ *t(y)ik ~ *t(y)ak 一 *ʔi[t], 隻 *tek gcig ac, tac
2 *nĭy *ni 二 *ni[j]-s gnyis nhac < *nhik
3 *sɨm *sum 三 *s.rum gsum sumḥ
4 *lĭy *lǝy 四 *s.li[j]-s bzhi liy
5 *ŋāH *ŋa 五 *C.ŋˤaʔ lnga ṅāḥ
6 *rŭk *ruk 六 *k.ruk drug khrok < *khruk
7 *(s-)nĭt *ni 七 *[tsʰ]i[t] N/A khu-nac
8 *ryēt *gyat ~ *ryat ~ *rit 八 *pˤret brgyad rhac < rhyat
9 *kwɨH *gǝw ~ *kǝw 九 *[k]uʔ dgu kuiḥ
10 *k(ʰ)ĭp *g(y)ip 十 *t.[g]әp N/A kip
100 *(p-)ryā *gya 百 *pˤrak brgya ryā
  1. Tibetan bdun has unknown origins, likely used to avoid confusion with the similar-sounding "two".
  2. Tibetan bcu is a descendant of another PST root, *tsjaj.
  1. For Old Chinese notations in the Baxter–Sagart system:
    • Parentheses "()" indicate uncertain presence;
    • Square brackets "[]" indicate uncertain identity, e.g. *[t] as coda may in fact be *-t or *-p;
    • Angle brackets "<>" indicate infix;
    • Hyphen "-" indicates morpheme boundary;
    • Period "." indicates syllable boundary.

See also

  • Proto-Tibeto-Burman language
  • Cishan culture
  • Yangshao culture

wikipedia, wiki, encyclopedia, book, article, read, free download, Information about proto-sino-tibetan. What is proto-sino-tibetan? What does proto-sino-tibetan mean?

←Next PostPrevious Post→
Most Read - Wikipedia
  • March 02, 2026

    Unattractiveness

  • March 07, 2026

    Tower block

  • March 04, 2026

    Apollo 11

  • March 07, 2026

    Classical era

  • March 04, 2026

    Aeneas Williams

Studio

  • Wikipedia

Newsletter Signup

Get in touch
Contact us
© 2025 www.azur.en-us.nina.az - All rights reserved.
Copyright: Dadash Mammadov
Top